IPM Logo

International Panel on Migration

Bridging the Gap Between Migration Science and Public Understanding

The IPM provides rigorous, independent scientific assessments on migration and displacement to inform policymakers, media, and the public through comprehensive research and evidence-based analysis.

About the IPM

The International Panel on Migration (IPM) is an action-oriented scientific organization, rooted in scholarly rigour and collective intelligence. It operates both as a clearinghouse and a platform, combining scientific excellence with active public engagement.

The IPM responds to the growing disconnect between science, public perception and understanding, and political discourse in the field of migration. By structuring and amplifying a pluralistic, reflexive, and globally representative scientific voice, the IPM aspires to reassert the legitimacy and utility of science in one of the most contentious domains of national politics and global governance.

The Challenge

A widening gap exists between scientific research, public understanding, political culture and policymaking in the governance of migration, undermining evidence-based approaches to global mobility.

The Response

The global scientific community demands more proactive, structured, and impactful engagement to ensure research informs policy and public discourse.

The Solution

A permanent, independent international panel that provides comprehensive assessments, translating cutting-edge research into accessible, actionable knowledge.

Mission Statement

The International Panel on Migration is a scientific, independent, interdisciplinary, international, and permanent organization that draws on cutting-edge research across social sciences to provide comprehensive and systematic knowledge on migration and displacement.

Its core mission is to communicate the results of academic research to inform the public sphere and provide necessary evidence for migration governance.

Core Principles

Scientific

Carefully evaluating the latest evidence from all social sciences, adopting rigorous criteria that abide by the highest standards of research.

Independent

Led by an independent community of distinguished social scientists and scholars, free from personal, political, and institutional influence.

Interdisciplinary

Gathering scientists from all relevant disciplines, acknowledging the range of methods used to study migration, mobility, and displacement.

International

Emphasizing a global perspective with strong regional balance, prioritizing collaboration with scholars from around the world.

Enduring

A standing, independent body providing a stable platform for rigorous scientific investigation through sustained engagement.

Working Groups

During the transitional phase (2025-2027), the IPM establishes four thematic Working Groups as the core scientific engines of the panel. Each Working Group conducts rigorous, systematic assessments of the state of knowledge on a globally relevant migration research question.

WG I

Climate Mobility

Assessing the scientific evidence on climate change and human movement

Explore
WG II

Migration and Society

Synthesizing evidence on migration's social dimensions across world regions

Explore
WG III

Forced Migration and Displacement

Building the evidence base on forced displacement, protection, and durable solutions

Explore
WG IV

Demography and Migration

Assessing the demographic dimensions of migration and their long-term implications

Explore
WG I

Climate Mobility

Assessing the scientific evidence on climate change and human movement

The Challenge

Climate change is reshaping human mobility at a scale and speed that science is only beginning to document. Displacement driven by extreme weather events, slow-onset environmental degradation, sea-level rise, and resource scarcity is now one of the defining migration challenges of our time — yet the evidence base remains fragmented, contested, and poorly communicated to those who need it most.

Mandate

The Working Group on Climate Mobility conducts a rigorous, systematic assessment of the state of scientific knowledge on the relationship between climate change and human movement. Drawing on evidence across geography, sociology, environmental science, economics, and public policy, it synthesizes what is known — and what remains uncertain — about the drivers, patterns, scale, and governance implications of climate-related mobility.

Scope and Approach

The Working Group assesses evidence from all world regions, with particular attention to areas most exposed to climate risk, including Sub-Saharan Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Small Island Developing States, and the Arctic. It actively counteracts the overrepresentation of destination-country perspectives in existing research by centering evidence from origin and transit contexts.

Why It Matters

Scientific evidence on climate mobility is growing rapidly but remains siloed across disciplines and regions. Gaps between knowledge and policy have real consequences: communities at risk are inadequately protected, adaptation strategies are poorly calibrated, and international governance frameworks lack the evidence base they need. The Working Group bridges these gaps, producing authoritative, accessible, and policy-relevant assessments that can inform climate adaptation planning, migration governance, and humanitarian preparedness worldwide.

Expected Outputs

  • Global Assessment Report on Climate Mobility
  • Accessible policy summaries and research briefs
  • Thematic reports on specific climate-mobility dynamics
Rigorous Selection This Working Group applies IPM's full expert selection framework — ensuring disciplinary diversity, geographic balance, meaningful inclusion of scholars from low- and middle-income countries (minimum 40%), gender parity, career-stage diversity, and linguistic inclusion beyond English-dominant networks.
WG II

Migration and Society

Synthesizing evidence on migration's social dimensions across world regions

The Challenge

Migration transforms societies — and societies shape migration. Yet the evidence on how migration intersects with social cohesion, identity, discrimination, integration, and public attitudes is deeply contested, frequently politicized, and unevenly distributed across world regions and academic traditions. At a moment when migration is central to political debates globally, the gap between what researchers know and what the public and policymakers believe has never been more consequential.

Mandate

The Working Group on Migration and Society provides a systematic, cross-disciplinary assessment of evidence on the social dimensions of migration. This includes integration and incorporation of migrants in receiving societies; the effects of migration on social institutions and communities; public attitudes toward migration and migrants; discrimination and racism; transnational social ties; and the lived experiences of migrants themselves.

Scope and Approach

The Working Group integrates sociology, anthropology, political science, psychology, and cultural studies — combining qualitative, ethnographic, and participatory approaches alongside quantitative data. It incorporates perspectives from origin, transit, and destination country contexts, as well as internal migration dynamics across the Global South.

Why It Matters

Migration scholarship is disproportionately concentrated in high-income destination countries in Europe and North America. This geographic imbalance shapes which questions are asked, which communities are studied, and which findings reach policy audiences. By assembling a globally representative body of expertise, the Working Group corrects this imbalance and helps policymakers design evidence-based integration and social cohesion strategies.

Expected Outputs

  • Global Assessment Report on Migration and Society
  • Policy summaries on integration, discrimination, and public attitudes
  • Thematic reports on specific social dimensions of migration
Rigorous Selection This Working Group applies IPM's full expert selection framework — ensuring disciplinary diversity, geographic balance, meaningful inclusion of scholars from low- and middle-income countries (minimum 40%), gender parity, career-stage diversity, and linguistic inclusion beyond English-dominant networks.
WG III

Forced Migration and Displacement

Building the evidence base on forced displacement, protection, and durable solutions

The Challenge

Forced migration — encompassing refugees, asylum seekers, internally displaced persons, and others compelled to move by conflict, persecution, and violence — has reached historic levels, with over 120 million people forcibly displaced. Despite decades of humanitarian and academic engagement, major knowledge gaps persist: about the long-term trajectories of displaced populations, about conditions that enable durable solutions, and about protection gaps faced by those who do not fit neatly into legal categories.

Mandate

The Working Group on Forced Migration and Displacement undertakes a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of the scientific knowledge on forced displacement. It examines the causes, patterns, and scale of forced movement; legal and normative frameworks governing protection; the conditions and experiences of displaced populations over time; and the policies and interventions that shape outcomes for displaced people and host communities.

Scope and Approach

The Working Group spans law, political science, sociology, geography, public health, and economics, integrating evidence from contexts where displacement is most acute, including the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and the Americas. It brings together researchers from both academic and practitioner traditions, reflecting IPM's commitment to combining scientific rigor with real-world relevance.

Why It Matters

Responses to forced displacement are too often reactive rather than evidence-informed. The knowledge base is fragmented across legal, humanitarian, and academic silos, and inadequately communicated to decision-makers. The Working Group produces authoritative, independent assessments that can strengthen protection frameworks, improve humanitarian programming, and support more effective, rights-based approaches to displacement globally.

Expected Outputs

  • Global Assessment Report on Forced Migration and Displacement
  • Policy briefs on protection gaps and durable solutions
  • Thematic reports on displacement in specific regional contexts
Rigorous Selection This Working Group applies IPM's full expert selection framework — ensuring disciplinary diversity, geographic balance, meaningful inclusion of scholars from low- and middle-income countries (minimum 40%), gender parity, career-stage diversity, and linguistic inclusion beyond English-dominant networks.
WG IV

Demography and Migration

Assessing the demographic dimensions of migration and their long-term implications

The Challenge

Migration is one of the most powerful forces shaping demographic change in the 21st century — influencing population size, age structure, labor markets, urbanization, and the long-term sustainability of social systems worldwide. Yet demographic evidence on migration is frequently oversimplified in public and policy discourse, poorly integrated across origin and destination perspectives, and inadequately linked to the structural forces — aging populations, fertility decline, urbanization, labor demand — that drive and are shaped by mobility.

Mandate

The Working Group on Demography and Migration conducts a systematic, cross-national assessment of the demographic dimensions of human mobility. It examines migration flows and their measurement; the demographic characteristics and trajectories of migrant populations; effects of migration on population dynamics in sending and receiving countries; labor migration and economic integration; the relationship between migration and urbanization; and long-term demographic scenarios associated with different migration trends and policies.

Scope and Approach

The Working Group integrates demography, economics, sociology, statistics, and public policy, combining quantitative rigor with contextual analysis. It draws on data and evidence from all world regions, with explicit attention to the underrepresentation of Global South perspectives in demographic migration research.

Why It Matters

Demographic evidence on migration is essential for sound long-term planning — for pension systems, labor markets, urban infrastructure, and social services. Yet demographic projections are rarely communicated accessibly, and their policy implications are frequently contested along political rather than scientific lines. The Working Group provides authoritative, independent assessments that anchor evidence-based demographic planning and challenge distortions in public debate.

Expected Outputs

  • Global Assessment Report on Demography and Migration
  • Data briefs on migration flows and demographic trends
  • Thematic reports on labor migration, urbanization, and aging
Rigorous Selection This Working Group applies IPM's full expert selection framework — ensuring disciplinary diversity, geographic balance, meaningful inclusion of scholars from low- and middle-income countries (minimum 40%), gender parity, career-stage diversity, and linguistic inclusion beyond English-dominant networks.

How Working Group Members Are Selected

The IPM applies an expertise threshold followed by a multi-dimensional diversity composition matrix. This process is documented publicly to ensure accountability and transparency.

Contribution Score

Outstanding Contribution

Scored 0–5 across citation metrics, policy-relevant outputs, and leadership roles. Excellence is assessed relative to career stage and field — quantitative metrics inform but do not determine selection.

Disciplinary Diversity

Disciplinary Diversity

Each Working Group of 10–15 members must represent at least 6 disciplines, with a minimum of 30% qualitative and 30% quantitative researchers, and at least 20% mixed-methods or other approaches.

Regional Balance

Regional & Institutional Balance

All major world regions must be represented. Minimum 40% of members from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). At least one expert each from origin, transit, and destination country contexts.

Gender Balance

Gender Balance

Parity target of 50% ±5% across Working Group membership and leadership positions. Blind initial scoring for expertise is applied, with gender balancing during final composition stage.

Career Stage

Career-Stage Inclusion

Composition rule: 40–60% senior scholars (20+ years post-degree), 20–40% mid-career (8–20 years), and 20–40% early career (0–7 years). This enhances innovation and prevents entrenchment of dominant paradigms.

Linguistic Inclusion

Linguistic & Epistemic Inclusion

IPM explicitly recruits beyond English-dominant publication networks. Primary publication language, inclusion of non-English scholarship, and experience in non-Western knowledge contexts are all tracked.

Join the IPM Scientific Community

Contribute your expertise to global migration research and policy engagement. We're building a worldwide network of scholars committed to evidence-based migration discourse.

Express Your Interest

Governance Structure

The IPM evolves incrementally into a fully constituted international scientific panel. The current phase (2025-2027) establishes the institutional architecture while laying the foundation for inclusive and decentralized participation.

Steering Committee

Leadership body of 12-16 members composed of academics-scientists (¾) and non-scientists (¼). Sets the thematic agenda, approves the work plan, and serves as ambassadors of the IPM.

Steven Vertovec

Steven Vertovec

Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany

Brenda S.A. Yeoh

Brenda S.A. Yeoh

National University of Singapore (NUS), Department of Geography

Gracia Liu-Farrer

Gracia Liu-Farrer

Waseda University, Graduate School of Asia-Pacific Studies, Tokyo, Japan

Leander Kandilige

Leander Kandilige

University of Ghana, Centre for Migration Studies

S. Irudaya Rajan

S. Irudaya Rajan

International Institute for Migration and Development (IIMAD), India

Claudia Patricia Masferrer León

Claudia Patricia Masferrer León

El Colegio de México (COLMEX)

Anna Triandafyllidou

Anna Triandafyllidou

Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU), Canada

Mira Siegelberg

Mira Siegelberg

The New School for Social Research; Zolberg Institute on Migration and Mobility

Thomas Lacroix

Thomas Lacroix

CNRS (French National Centre for Scientific Research); Sciences Po Paris

Martin Ruhs

Martin Ruhs

European University Institute (EUI), Florence, Italy

Andrew Selee

Andrew Selee

Migration Policy Institute (MPI)

Colleen Thouez

Colleen Thouez

UNITAR (United Nations Institute for Training and Research)

Elizabeth Collett

Elizabeth Collett

MPI Europe; Independent Consultant

Peter Scholten

Peter Scholten

Erasmus University Rotterdam; Leiden University

Bureau

Comprising the President, three regional Vice-Presidents, and the Executive Director of the Secretariat. Implements the decisions of the Steering Committee.

Steven Vertovec

Steven Vertovec

President — Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity

Claudia Patricia Masferrer León

Claudia Patricia Masferrer León

Vice-President — El Colegio de México (COLMEX)

Brenda S.A. Yeoh

Brenda S.A. Yeoh

Vice-President — National University of Singapore

Leander Kandilige

Leander Kandilige

Vice-President — University of Ghana, Centre for Migration Studies

Secretariat

Based at the Zolberg Institute, The New School. Handles internal and external communications, community-building, public and political engagement, fundraising, and logistical coordination.

Achilles Kallergis

Achilles Kallergis

Executive Director of the Secretariat

Jonas Bergmann

Jonas Bergmann

Strategy Officer

Aratrika Debnath

Aratrika Debnath

Data Officer

Manavi Datta

Manavi Datta

Community Engagement and Design Officer

Working Groups

Thematic groups anchored in regional hubs (Africa, Asia-Oceania, Europe, Americas) that address themes of global relevance.

Advisory Board

Composed of 10-20 non-voting observers from international organizations, donors, and civil society. Provides external feedback and reinforces diplomatic and political resonance.

IPM Scientific Community

A globally representative coalition of scientists committed to IPM's mission, serving as the author pool for future global and thematic assessment cycles.

Contact

Secretariat

Zolberg Institute on Migration and Mobility
The New School
New York, USA

Email: [email protected]
Website: www.migrationpanel.org

For Media Inquiries

For press inquiries and media requests, please contact our communications team at [email protected]